Quick Tip: One Great Game Is Better Than Two Good Ones

Quick Tip: One Great Game Is Better Than Two Good Ones

Sid Meier. If you’re reading anything on this site, you probably already know who this man is. He’s one of the biggest names in game development, has been making and releasing games since 1982, and is best known for the Civilization series. In this Quick Tip, we’ll look at what we can learn from a quote of his regarding his 1990 game Covert Action.


Sid Meier’s Quote

Rather than cutting anything out of the quote, I’ll present it here in its entirety:

“The mistake I think I made in Covert Action is actually having two games in there kind of competing with each other. There was kind of an action game where you break into a building and do all sorts of picking up clues and things like that, and then there was the story which involved a plot where you had to figure out who the mastermind was and the different roles and what cities they were in, and it was a kind of an involved mystery-type plot.

Covert Action Rule

Part of the action game in Covert Action. (Source: Covert Action Wiki)

“I think, individually, those each could have been good games. Together, they fought with each other. You would have this mystery that you were trying to solve, then you would be facing this action sequence, and you’d do this cool action thing, and you’d get on the building, and you’d say, “What was the mystery I was trying to solve?” Covert Action integrated a story and action poorly, because the action was actually too intense. In Pirates!, you would do a sword fight or a ship battle, and a minute or two later, you were kind of back on your way. In Covert Action, you’d spend ten minutes or so of real time in a mission, and by the time you got out of the mission, you had no idea of what was going on in the world.

Covert Action Rule
Part of the mystery game in Covert Action. (Source: Covert Action Wiki)

“So I call it the ‘Covert Action Rule’. Don’t try to do too many games in one package. And that’s actually done me a lot of good. You can look at the games I’ve done since Civilization, and there’s always opportunities to throw in more stuff. When two units get together in Civilization and have a battle, why don’t we drop out to a war game and spend ten minutes or so in duking out this battle? Well, the Covert Action Rule. Focus on what the game is.”

-Sid Meier

Source: The Sid Meier Legacy, at GameSpot.


What Does This Mean?

At face value, what it looks like he’s saying here is to keep your game streamlined, focus on the most interesting part of your game, flesh it out, and cut the rest. The player isn’t particularly interested in how many different gameplay types you manage to fit in to your product, they are interested in the enjoyment they get from those pieces as a whole. What this rule initially seems to call for is single-faceted games, where a singular mechanic or gameplay style carries an entire game.

If you think about it a little longer, though, you can see what he’s really saying here is to keep your game focused; to find what the driving factor behind your game is, and focus on that. This notion is not necessarily related to the idea of a single-faceted game — in fact it seems modern triple-A gaming has taken to challenging the Covert Action rule at every opportunity.

Many popular games released today contain many “games” in one package — from Borderlands, a game combining first person shooting with traditional RPG-style loot, levelling and questing systems, to the Mass Effect series, which expertly combines third person cover based shooting, traditional RPG-style loot, levelling and questing systems as well as a dating sim and wraps it all up under an epic sci-fi tale filled with player consequence and branching plotlines.

All of these games look like they’re breaking the Covert Action rule, as they clearly focus on many disparate gameplay elements. However, under closer scrutiny, they follow the rule to a tee. Neither of these games ever lose track of the primary element driving their respective games forward. The shooting in Borderlands never becomes too difficult or too complicated to overtake the addictive loot and experience grind the game is centered around, and everything the player does in the Mass Effect games makes sense within the context of the narrative and only ever serves to make the player feel like an organic part of the world they are participating in.

It’s Not Easy Being Lean

Unfortunately, and this is where most developers falter: doing this kind of thing is very difficult and requires incredible expertise, foresight and most importantly, time and resources. Too Human shows clearly what happens when the Covert Action rule is challenged, with disastrous results.

Too Human was very similar to the Mass Effect games in that it was supposed to feature a deep and interesting narrative, strong action gameplay and an addicting loot system. For whatever reasons (the game had a long and troubled development) although the final game did contain these three elements, none of them were done very well. The developers put too much in the oven and everything came out half-baked.

Hopefully you’ve learned a little about Sid Meier’s Covert Action rule and can see how it’s something that’s important to think about in your own projects. For another take on this rule, as well as four other of Sid Meier’s development rules, check out Soren Johnson’s article on the subject. Thanks for reading!

Note: Want to add some source code? Type <pre><code> before it and </code></pre> after it. Find out more
  • http://gamedev.tutsplus.com Michael James Williams

    Do you think this ties in to your Player Mobility article? It sounds like Spider-Man 2 focused on making a great web-swinging game, while The Amazing Spider-Man tried to make a game that was about both web-swinging and indoor combat.

    • http://soherearemyideas.blogspot.com Paul Suddaby
      Author

      Honestly, I think a lot of things went wrong with The Amazing Spider-Man but I’m not sure if this was one of them. That’s because I don’t think the game is about web-swinging in any functional capacity. It should have been about web-swinging, everybody thinks it’s about web-swinging and it would’ve been better if it was about web swinging. But it’s actually just an indoor stealth game through and through except they added spider-man and all the abilities people come to expect him to have. Honestly as weird as it sounds spider-man is just out of place in that game.

      Maybe that is breaking the rule though, I mean, it isn’t actually about two different gameplay styles, but the player expects it to be about web-swinging to some degree because it’s spider-man. Does that mean that in a vacuum the game doesn’t break the rule, but with everything we know about spider-man (and the expectations that go along with that) it actually DOES because it has a second gameplay style (web-swinging) that is underdeveloped in that it’s actually not there.

      Woah.

  • JoeMoe

    This rule kind of reminds me of one of my favorite games Actraiser (the first one). Actraiser had 2 different gameplay styles. One was a side scrolling action game. The other was more of a generic sim city building game. I think this game received a lot of criticism for having 2 different styles where some people just wanted to play the side scroller action part. There is a professionalism mode where the game only uses the action element of the game and ignores any part of the story that uses the sim city style.

    The second installment of the Actraiser series didn’t even have the sim city style. They stuck to the action style of the game and made it strictly a side scroller. The enhanced the action, as they were more focused on it, by adding flight and more attacks.

    Personally I don’t think that the first Actraiser game failed or really follows the Covert Action Rule fully. The reason I don’t think it follows the rule is because that game mode was by choice. The player could choose full action or action with RPG.

    This is why AAA titles get away with adding additional elements to gameplay. The player chooses which games they want to play within that game.

  • http://www.gemfruit.com Porter

    Interesting read for sure. While I’ve definitely thought about the concepts behind the rule, I’d never actually heard of it.

    While there’s definitely room to mix genres together, I agree that it’s quite dangerous. As JoeMoe said, it’s a great idea to stick to a core genre, and allow players to venture into something else, if they so please. When you force various gameplay types upon the player, you risk losing them due to their lack of interest in one or more of your various types. A perfect example of this, while not so clear to many people, is Final Fantasy. Many people love the world, the story, the adventuring, but absolutely despise the slow paced battle system. I was dating someone for awhile who honestly wanted to move forward in the story, but quit because of the battle system, which is arguably a secondary play style to adventuring. While that’s a slightly obscure example, and mixing something like puzzle and action is more clear, the point still stands.

    I kind of view mixing genres like mixing food, some combinations work, others are just plain horrible.

  • http://home.smithwebco.com Sean Smith

    I think of Animal Crossing when I read this, since they had a super laid back style of gameplay, there were lots of mini-game activities involved in within them, although those might have been the purpose of the game all along… I guess what I take away from this is that if you’re going to have multiple gameplay styles, do it well (easier said than done) b/c it’s easy to screw it up and make a crappy blend of all kinds of stuff. I liked how Fallout combined little things like that into a massive game also.